SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (11.05.2025)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Others

Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles. As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities, and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting. Bell of the Week: The UDRP Some bells do not just chime, they emerge with entirely new spaces. This week’s bell is for the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, a mechanism that reshaped how trademark disputes are handled in the digital world. […]

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (11.05.2025) Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 4 – May 10)

/ By / Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

Into the second week of May with a post on the Bombay HC’s reliance on section 65 for setting aside a refusal of atomic energy patent. Another post examining the Academy’s control on the Oscar statuette that blurs the boundaries between contract, property, and IP law. Case summaries and IP developments from the country and the globe and much more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know.

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 4 – May 10) Read More »

Call for Submissions: NALSAR’s Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law (IJIPL) Vol. 16 (Deadline: August 1)

/ By / Opportunities

NALSAR University of Law’s Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law (IJIPL) is now accepting submissions for its 16th Volume. The last date for sending your submissions is August 1. For more details, read the call for submissions below:- Call for Submissions: NALSAR’s Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law (IJIPL) Vol. 16 (Deadline: August 1) The Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law (IJIPL) is the flagship intellectual property law journal of NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. As India’s first student-run journal devoted exclusively to

Call for Submissions: NALSAR’s Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law (IJIPL) Vol. 16 (Deadline: August 1) Read More »

The $1 Oscar: Can Contract and IP Quietly Create Illusory Ownership?

/ By / Copyright, Trademark

The Oscar statuette may look like a personal trophy, but legally, it is something far more controlled. Through a contractual regime supported by intellectual property considerations, the Academy has ensured that an Oscar cannot become an ordinary tradable asset. Soundarya Lakshmi K examines how the Academy’s famous “$1 rule” blurs the boundaries between contract, property, and IP law, while also questioning whether Indian courts would uphold similar restrictions on ownership and transfer. Soundarya Lakshmi is a PhD Research Scholar at

The $1 Oscar: Can Contract and IP Quietly Create Illusory Ownership? Read More »

Shooting The Second Suit: Castrol v Sonavane & The Application of Order II Rule 2

/ By / Trademark

IP disputes rarely unfold in neat, linear ways, and Castrol v. Sanjay Sonavane is a case in point. Faced with a fast-evolving conflict spanning threats, raids, and a coordinated media campaign, Castrol had to navigate a tricky procedural question: one suit or many? In this post, Naman Singh examines the Delhi High Court’s answer and why its nuanced take on “cause of action” under Order II Rule 2 CPC carries significance well beyond the facts of the case. Naman is

Shooting The Second Suit: Castrol v Sonavane & The Application of Order II Rule 2 Read More »

An Unreasoned Refusal and a Wrongly Used Provision: Huntington v Union of India and Atomic Energy Patents

/ By / Patent

Lack of reasons in IPO’s orders as a broader issue on one side, and add to it the context of atomic energy-related patents: you have a situation where refusal of patent applications becomes a hotly contested topic. This post  is about a recent Bombay HC judgment (Huntington Alloys v UOI) concerning the refusal of a patent application under Section 4 of the Patents Act. Arising out of a writ petition, the judgment held the government respondents to task; the Court

An Unreasoned Refusal and a Wrongly Used Provision: Huntington v Union of India and Atomic Energy Patents Read More »

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (04.05.2026)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Opportunities

Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles. As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting. Bell of the Week: Martha Woodmansee Some bells do not just chime, they change how we understand creation itself. This week’s bell is for someone whose work has shaped how many of us think about authorship and its relationship with intellectual property. Ever

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (04.05.2026) Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 27- May 3)

/ By / Copyright, Geographical Indication, Patent, Trademark

[This Weekly Review is authored by Naman Singh. Naman is an LLB (Hons.) student at National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. Having a background in music, film, and media, He enjoys all things at the intersection of IP and law.] The call for applications for SPARC Cohort 1 is now open! This week, marking the end of April, also saw a batch of interesting discussions that ranged from lapsed trademarks, generics production, the needed evolution of the GI tag

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 27- May 3) Read More »

Launching the SpicyIP Academy Research Clinic (SPARC)!

/ By / Opportunities, Others

The call for applications for SPARC Cohort 1 is now open!  We are delighted to announce the launch of SPARC, the SpicyIP Academy Research Clinic SPARC is our dedicated attempt at bridging the accessibility gap to structured peer review that a large number of Indian IP researchers currently face. We understand that substantive, expert feedback during the early and middle stages of research is still limited to a small number of well-resourced institutions. SPARC is our effort to build a

Launching the SpicyIP Academy Research Clinic (SPARC)! Read More »

Dead Marks, Live Assets – The Case for a Registry Supervised Auction of Lapsed Trademarks in India

/ By / Trademark

India’s trademark register is quietly bleeding value. Each year, marks with real commercial recall lapse not because they’ve lost relevance, but because renewal deadlines are missed, erasing years of built goodwill from the legal record. In this post, Lakshmidevi Somanath argues that instead of letting these assets vanish, India should rethink its approach and create a system to recycle lapsed trademarks back into the market. Lakshmidevi Somanath is a Partner – Litigation & Strategy in Anand and Anand and former

Dead Marks, Live Assets – The Case for a Registry Supervised Auction of Lapsed Trademarks in India Read More »

Scroll to Top