SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (16.02.2026)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Opportunities

Welcome back to another week of Bells and Whistles. We’re starting this week with some exciting updates from the SpicyIP community! The finalists for the first National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property and Innovation have now been announced. Congratulations are in order for everyone who has been shortlisted. Click here to know more about it! Also SpicyIP Summer School 2026 is opening for applications soon so kindly mark your calendars for June 20-28th of 2026. And with that, let’s ring this week’s bell! […]

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (16.02.2026) Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 9 – February 15)

/ By / Competition Law, Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

Announcing the Finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025! Posts on Delhi HC’s evolving jurisprudence on pro-tem security deposits in FRAND trials, Supreme Court to decide CCI’s jurisdiction over abuse of patent rights, and the Supreme Court allowing the Petitioners to map their claims against Zydus’s product in Nivolumab infringement dispute. Case summaries and IP developments from the country and the globe in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 9 – February 15) Read More »

Announcing the Finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025!

/ By / Opportunities, Patent, Trade Secret

After an engaging pre-final round on February 10, we are delighted to announce the finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation, 2025 organized by SpicyIP and CIPAM, DPIIT! The pre-final round witnessed thoughtful presentations from our shortlisted teams, followed by rigorous engagement with questions from the fantastic panel of judges comprising Ms. Sumathi Chandrashekaran, Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, and Mr. Murali Neelakantan. We are immensely grateful to our judges for their time and careful evaluation,

Announcing the Finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025! Read More »

ER Squibb to map Zydus’s product: Does this mean closure?

/ By / Patent

There has been another development in ER Squibb v Zydus, at the center of which is Nivolumab, an anti-cancer drug. Readers will remember that on 12th January 2025, a division bench of the Delhi HC had allowed Zydus to launch their biosimilar product, ZRC-3276, in the market.(here) The bench had refused to grant an interim injunction against Zydus’s launch because the Patentee had not mapped the product against their claims. As a result, the Court held, it could not arrive at a

ER Squibb to map Zydus’s product: Does this mean closure? Read More »

SC to decide CCI’s Jurisdiction over abuse of Patent Rights

/ By / Competition Law, Patent

Can CCI decide whether a patentee, in exercising his exclusive rights under the Patent Act, has violated the provisions of Competition Act, 2002? Readers of this blog must be aware how hotly contested this question is (here, here, here, here and here). From initially holding that CCI does have jurisdiction to investigate, a DHC DB had ultimately ousted CCI’s power to investigate abuse of patent rights. Last year, disposing of a SLP against the DB judgement, the SC had refused to decide the above issue since the parties had reached a

SC to decide CCI’s Jurisdiction over abuse of Patent Rights Read More »

‘Pro-tem’ FRAND Deposits: Are temporary orders here to stay?

/ By / Patent

The Indian jurisprudence on ‘pro-tem’ security deposits in FRAND trials has been twelve years in the making at the Delhi High Court. Full details of the contents of pro-tem orders have been frequently discussed on the blog, see here, here, here and here. In this post, I am concerned particularly with what justifications have been used by the court to develop its pro-tem jurisprudence – creative expansions of the SEP litigation strategy toolkit are welcome, but not at the cost

‘Pro-tem’ FRAND Deposits: Are temporary orders here to stay? Read More »

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (09.02.2026)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Opportunities

Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles. As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities, and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting. Bell of the Week: Professor Anil Gupta Some bells don’t just chime, they change what we choose to hear. This week’s Bell of the Week is Prof. Anil Gupta, the mind behind the Honey Bee Network, who gently but powerfully shifted the lens of

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (09.02.2026) Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 2 – February 8)

/ By / Copyright, Design, Others, Patent, Trademark

Into the second week of February, with formal comments from our bloggers on the DPIIT’s proposed “One Nation One License One Payment” framework for GenAI and Copyright. A post on an industrial drama written in 1847 bursting the myth of the free-market society, and another post on the recent concept note by the DPIIT proposing reforms to India’s design law. Case summaries and IP developments from the country and the globe in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 2 – February 8) Read More »

Design Law Reforms: Searching for Justifications

/ By / Design

Long post ahead! DPIIT on 23rd January 2026 had put out a concept note titled “Proposed Amendments to the Designs Act, 2000” and has invited comments from stakeholders, with the last day for submitting comments being 22nd February 2026. Some reforms are substantive, affecting the scope of design law. While others are administrative, intended to smooth out the difficulties that design applicants face. This post would be a quick analysis of some of the reforms being suggested. The reforms I

Design Law Reforms: Searching for Justifications Read More »

From the Archives: The Giant, the Dwarf and the Lawyer – An 1847 Trilogue!

/ By / Patent

(Disclaimer: Long post ahead, mostly a translated excerpt from an archive. But it might be engrossing, or so I hope.) Namaskar/Salam, If you remember, a few years ago (oh, ‘tis already a long ago …), Swaraj and I penned a series called IP Reveries, problematizing intellectual property rights, their theoretical justifications and history through a hypothetical classroom setting. Well … Guess what?  While rummaging through some 19th-century archives recently, I lit upon a text from 1847 carrying a similar thing!

From the Archives: The Giant, the Dwarf and the Lawyer – An 1847 Trilogue! Read More »

Scroll to Top