Logo of Zara with the word "Zara" written in black.

No Declaration Required: What the Delhi High Court’s ZARA v. ZORA Ruling Means for Section 11(2)

/ By / Trademark

The Delhi High Court’s ZARA v. ZORA ruling settles one question while leaving another lurking beneath it. A formal declaration, the Court holds, is not necessary to invoke Section 11(2). But if well-known status can be established through individual proceedings, what happens to the certainty that Rule 124 was meant to provide? Harjas Singh Gulati writes on this development below. Harjas is a Trainee Associate at ALG India Law Offices LLP. He is interested in Intellectual property matters along with

No Declaration Required: What the Delhi High Court’s ZARA v. ZORA Ruling Means for Section 11(2) Read More »

TCRC v. Ganga Rudraiah: Copyright, Acquiescence, and the Cost of an Unwritten Arrangement

/ By / Copyright

The Madras High Court’s decision in TCRC v. Ganga Rudraiah may appear to be about the ownership of BTS photographs from the making of the hit film ‘Aval Appadithan‘. But the reasoning gets considerably less straightforward when the Court’s treatment of Section 17(b), consideration, and acquiescence is examined closely. Vanshika Verma writes on this development below. Vanshika is a fifth-year B.A. LL.B. student at Symbiosis Law School, Noida, with an interest in commercial law, IPR, technology law and policy. TCRC

TCRC v. Ganga Rudraiah: Copyright, Acquiescence, and the Cost of an Unwritten Arrangement Read More »

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (22.09.2026)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Opportunities

Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles. As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities, and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting. Bell of the Week: Who Speaks for the Public Domain?  Every now and then, I come across an organisation that makes me pause not because of the number of people it represents or the size of its operations, but because of the

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (22.09.2026) Read More »

Remembering Prof. (Dr.) Pinaki Ghosh, WBNUJS IP Chair Professor

/ By / Geographical Indication, Others, Overlaps in IP

Image Source: WBNUJS Website It is with profound sadness that I inform you of the passing of Prof. (Dr.) Pinaki Ghosh, erstwhile WBNUJS IP Chair Professor. Dr. Ghosh, had been at the university since 2019 as its DPIIT IP Chair Professor till 31st March 2026. He died at the age of 61 after a prolonged illness. As reported by his colleagues, during his tenure, nearly 24 Geographical Indication applications were taken forward with his significant involvement at the University. I

Remembering Prof. (Dr.) Pinaki Ghosh, WBNUJS IP Chair Professor Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (14 September-20 September)

/ By / Copyright, Drug Regulation, Patent, Trademark

In this edition of the SpicyIP Weekly Review, we have comments submitted by a few of our team members on the IPO’s Draft Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications in the Field of Pharmaceuticals, 2026, along with case summaries of the orders and judgments we were able to find. If we’ve missed anything, drop a comment below and let us know. Highlight of the Week Specific Comments on the IPO’s Draft Pharmaceutical Guidelines (2026) The IPO’s 2026 Draft Pharmaceutical Guidelines

SpicyIP Weekly Review (14 September-20 September) Read More »

Specific Comments on the IPO’s Draft Pharmaceutical Guidelines (2026)

/ By / Drug Regulation, Others, Patent

There is no easier way to put it – the IPO’s Draft Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications in the Field of Pharmaceuticals, 2026 (“2026 Draft Guidelines”) released 15 days ago have severe problems and require substantial reworking. There are many concerning reasons warranting an immediate and thorough revision of this draft for it to avoid disrupting patent law and patent prosecution as we know it. The 2026 Draft Guidelines have misquoted certain statutory provisions, misinterpreted some judicial decisions, misapplied

Specific Comments on the IPO’s Draft Pharmaceutical Guidelines (2026) Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 7- September 13)

/ By / Copyright, Patent, Trademark

After another busy week and a long weekend, here we are with the SpicyIP Weekly Review with discussions on the Delhi High Court’s evolving approach to personality rights, a closer look at the Court’s decision in the Sugammadex patent dispute. We also had posts on copyright strikes and intermediary due diligence, the ongoing Ribociclib litigation before the Kerala High Court, the paper trail in IPRS v. Hotel Appolo, and the Delhi High Court’s evolving approach towards well-known marks and TM

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 7- September 13) Read More »

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (15.09.2026)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Opportunities

Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles. As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities, and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting. Bell of the Week: The Man Who Helped Build India’s Trademark Law Before every brand had a registration number, a trademark database, or a legal team ready to protect it, India had to first build a system for recognising and protecting trademarks. 

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (15.09.2026) Read More »

[Sponsored] IP8 Expands into Patent Decision Intelligence with Five Connected AI Workflows

/ By / Sponsored

A year after launching agentic AI for patent-infringement surveillance, IP8 expands across critical patent decision workflows for law firms and enterprise IP teams. To know more, read their press release below:- [Sponsored] IP8 Expands into Patent Decision Intelligence with Five Connected AI Workflows (13 September 2026) Pune, India— IP8 today announced the launch of its next-generation Patent Decision Intelligence Platform, expanding from its original focus on continuous patent-infringement surveillance and monetization into a unified platform spanning Novelty, Invalidity, Freedom-to-Operate (FTO),

[Sponsored] IP8 Expands into Patent Decision Intelligence with Five Connected AI Workflows Read More »

Section 14 is Not Section 25: Delhi High Court Revives Sugammadex Patent Bid

/ By / Patent

The Delhi High Court’s order in Fresenius Kabi v. Controller may ultimately turn on a Section 14 violation, but the concerns it flags go well beyond procedure, extending to hindsight, prior-art mosaicking, and the treatment of technical evidence. Pranay Borupothu examines the decision and unpacks these procedural and substantive concerns in the Controller’s reasoning. Pranay is a 3rd-year LL.B.(Hons.) student at Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur, and has a keen interest in IP laws. Section 14 is

Section 14 is Not Section 25: Delhi High Court Revives Sugammadex Patent Bid Read More »

Scroll to Top